About your Search

20120925
20121003
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2
'm on the ballot, will be on the ballot in all 50 states. steve, right now we're on the ballot in 47 states and the district of columbia. we're litigated in the other three. so although there are other third-party candidates running this cycle, none of them are going to come close to what i just said. that said, um, where's the difference between the two? i'm going to argue that we should not bomb iran, that we should get out of afghanistan tomorrow, bring the troops home, that marriage equality is a constitutionally-guaranteed right. let's end the drug war, let's legalize marijuana now. i would have never signed the national defense authorization act allowing for you and i as u.s. citizens to be arrested and detained without being charged. i think that's why we've fought wars. i would have never signed the patriot act. i think the homeland security's incredibly redundant. tsa should not be the federal government, it should be airports, airlines, states, knew mispalties -- municipalities. balance the federal budget now. i think we all recognize that what we're doing is not sustainable. i th
: steve versus office of personnel management, a case out of california and in this case we have a district court finding doma unconstitutional, but they've not had a ninth circuit argument yet. the same day the department of justice filed for the guild massachusetts case they filed a petition for review called supreme court rule 11. it is really granted, the certain extraordinary cases for overriding national importance, the court has granted things. they saved you may want to consider this case. it's interesting the language they use. a grant of judgment to make sure they'll have enough vehicle to resolve in a timely fashion. i read that a shorthand for please take this case because justice kagan is recused from the other case. we have another case totally set up, already appealed, but we'd rather have kagan voting on this case. of course they filed a petition the same day, so suggest they were thinking about this. it's actually not clear at the department of justice has standing to appeal in that case because they really won below. there are during the defense of marriage act
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2